So you remember that post I made back on the 3rd? Apparently I’m not the only person wondering whether religious inclination is genetic. Picked up a May issue of MIND and saw this:
It was interesting except for a few points. But those are more nitpicking about semantics than the overall topic. It did reconfirm some of my ideas though. For example, studies HAVE shown that certain personality traits find it easier to shuck the religion of their youth while others are more easily swayed to stay faithful.
My semantics complaints were more terms like “agreeableness” and “self-controlled” etc. It made it sound like religious people hold monopoly on assisting others and selflessness. When in reality the definitions were more detailed than the negative feelings we attach to these terms. “Agreeableness” just means one who is less likely to disagree with others. But that is not always a good thing. Nazi Germany would be a quick example of how speaking out and fighting the norm can be a noble action even if it gets you labeled as “disagreeable”.
In short, people who are inherently questioning, pushing against norms and curious about science and facts tend to find it much easier to embrace atheism. Common sense sounding, but it should help you in any future debates. That fanatic you are trying to sway may not be receptive to any sort of logic, plea or empathy so save your energy and put it somewhere positive instead. 😀